03 Jul 09 16:25, Ross Cassell wrote to Roy Witt:

 Mo>>> You are goading him.

 RW>> You are full of shit. The man can't control himself, even when I
 RW>> ignore him. He has been booted from more echoes than the boys you've
 RW>> goaded in the echoes yourself. Not to mention your web-site that
 RW>> named each one of them for the entire world to see. Who was goading
 RW>> who then?

 RC> Whatever your perceived the web site to be, it did not disrupt the
 RC> echoes.. Oh the bellyaching about it did, but you know that a bunch
 RC> of html pages on a web server does not Fidonet make.

Non-the-less, it didn't make any peace in Fidonet among the (now former)
users from Florida's worst BBS.

 RC> Plus that web site has been down for 2 years now.

Maybe a year...

 RC> and all it had was their messages as written by them, along with some
 RC> accurate and some satirical photos..

I remember.

 RC> That web accessible Fido archive run by Andrew Clarke, ought to cause
 RC> them more distress.

They probably aren't aware of it, since Andrew doesn't advertise or rub it
in like you did.

 Mo>>> You are having the same effect on him that you had with I believe
 Mo>>> Harvgrove??? (Is that him)

 RW>> On the contrary, I'm defending myself from personal attacks from a
 RW>> person who doesn't seem to know the difference between a
 RW>> conversation and calling those who disagree with him as FOOLS,
 RW>> IDIOTS and now ASSHOLE...

 RC> If he is as un-controllable, then you should easily understand my
 RC> earlier appeal for you to eliminate yourself from the equation, you
 RC> have twit filtered people for less. Wayne Chirnside comes to mind.

Wayne isn't in my twit filer and never has been. I think his writing is
more hilarious than some of his cronies.

 Mo>>> Do not go out of the way to provoke Tom, if you cannot attack
 Mo>>> only his points without attacking him, then dont message him at
 Mo>>> all.

 RW>> Until this batch of replys to his name calling, I haven't goaded him
 RW>> into anything. It is his nature to call people names when he's
 RW>> confronted with any arguement that he disagrees with.

 RC> Please twit filter him... If Tom wishes to hang himself, its easier
 RC> for him to do so if you arent in the audience in front of the
 RC> gallows, yelling out to the executioner "pull the lever".

Everyone likes to see a hanging.

 RW>> If I need another feed to this echo to circumvent your bullshit
 RW>> vacation, that's no problem...

 RC> No need to get in a pissing contest, my first message on this was not
 RC> disrespectful and you know it.

If I didn't consider it out of line, I wouldn't have called it bullshit.

 RC> If you are the better man then please be the better man and stop
 RC> reading him or posting to him.

Please with sugar on it? :o)

                R\%/itt

Joy lives in the fight, in the attempt, in the suffering involved, not in
the victory itself.

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000