From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

Sergi.Reyner{at}FidoNet.no-ip.info wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:46:58 -0500, "Randall Parker"
>  wrote:
>
>> From: Randall Parker
 s
>> ide_dot-here_com>
>>
>> Sergi.Reyner{at}FidoNet.no-ip.info wrote:
>>
>>> It's been some time since I've used GNOME so I really wouldn't know,
>>> but in Konqueror you can press a key (Ctrl+T on older versions, F4 on
>>> newer ones) to open a Konsole right in the directory you are in.
>> I should have installed KDE...
>
> Actually I would recommend KDE over GNOME for anyone used to the
> Windows desktop. While GNOME has been designed around some usability
> principles and other, and it may be very well suited for a user who
> has *never* worked with computers, I think KDE's workings are more
> straight-forward for people coming from win32 world.
>
> You could say that GNOME is about simplicity, and KDE is about
> options. That, and the fact that it resembles more a Windows desktop.
>
> Criticisms are welcome, flames are not :)
>

I actually reckon that KDE is what the OS/2 WPS should have been. It was
modelled on the WPS in the first place & it's a solid WPS with
Stardock's Object Desktoop built in.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5