03 Jul 09 19:29, Ross Cassell wrote to Roy Witt:

 RC>>> Whatever your perceived the web site to be, it did not disrupt
 RC>>> the echoes.. Oh the bellyaching about it did, but you know that a
 RC>>> bunch of html pages on a web server does not Fidonet make.

 RW>> Non-the-less, it didn't make any peace in Fidonet among the (now
 RW>> former) users from Florida's worst BBS.

 RC> I wasnt making peace with them... I was reminding a few key
 RC> personalities of the lies they told/tell.

Kinda like when E'vis told a few about me and I called him on it. He
replied to me like Walker has today.

 RC>>> Plus that web site has been down for 2 years now.

 RW>> Maybe a year...

 RC> No its been over a year..

I see the message still exists in a folder in my email account that was
sent to me in regards to varifying my membership, dated Feb, 2007.

 RC> I re-purposed the hosting account I was using for matzdobre.us in
 RC> favor of fidonet4u.info.

I know.

 RC> It was late summer of 2007, after Wayne dropped off the radar. That
 RC> was back after Bush sent the jack booted thugs after him for all the
 RC> criticizing he did.

Well, you can't blame Bush for that. Wayne had that coming, right?

 RC>>> That web accessible Fido archive run by Andrew Clarke, ought to
 RC>>> cause them more distress.

 RW>> They probably aren't aware of it, since Andrew doesn't advertise or
 RW>> rub it in like you did.

 RC> Nevertheless this isnt about what I did and what I did you had no
 RC> problem with, especially since I poked fun at the Vlist, Dossche and
 RC> Felten to name a few.

Right. It's really about the pot calling the kettle black. I brought it up
because there was a bit of hypocracy in your assumption that what Walker
does is my fault.

 RC>>> If he is as un-controllable, then you should easily understand my
 RC>>> earlier appeal for you to eliminate yourself from the equation,
 RC>>> you have twit filtered people for less. Wayne Chirnside comes to
 RC>>> mind.

 RW>> Wayne isn't in my twit filer and never has been. I think his writing
 RW>> is more hilarious than some of his cronies.

 RC> Either way, I have seen you twit filter people for much less than
 RC> what Tom has done. Perhaps I was thinking of the Lofaso?

The reason I don't twit Walker (although I have in the past), is because
at times he can make sense, if he gets over his attitude about he's right
and the rest of the world is wrong and if you call him on it, he cusses
you out rather than comes back with no arguement at all.

 RC>>> No need to get in a pissing contest, my first message on this was
 RC>>> not disrespectful and you know it.

 RW>> If I didn't consider it out of line, I wouldn't have called it
 RW>> bullshit.

 RC> It takes 2 to tango, and I have learned that when hostilities break
 RC> out between people, both say they are innocent and the other is
 RC> guilty.

Usually when there's a pissing contest between two people, the last one to
make waves is the one who gets noticed and as a consequence of that,
suffers for both of them.

 RC>>> If you are the better man then please be the better man and stop
 RC>>> reading him or posting to him.

 RW>> Please with sugar on it? :o)

 RC> Would Splenda work?

 RC> Perty pleez?

I won't twit him, but I'll refrain from pulling his chain and try to talk
some sense with him, even if it is impossible. If I find him going off the
deep end again, I'll twit him then.


                R\%/itt

Joy lives in the fight, in the attempt, in the suffering involved, not in
the victory itself.

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000