Rob Perkins wrote:
> On 10/23/07 1:08 PM, in article QwsTi.78$B52.31{at}newsfe12.lga, "John W.
> Kennedy"  wrote:
> 
>> David E. Powell wrote:
>>> Dude, Fox News hardly has a monopoly even if they got caught in some
>>> fabrication. Actually fake documents sounds more like the CBS story
>>> that left Dan Rather in trouble.
>> The only /proven/ falsifications in that affair were those coming from
>> the ignorant (or lying) "experts" who claimed that
typewriters available
>> in the 70s couldn't do proportional type. Hell, my father's secretary
>> had a proportional-spacing typewriter in the 50s.
> 
> The AWOL allegations were probably true, at least insofar as Bush got a
> better rap during his military service than virtually anyone else could have
> dreamed of. But the guy who falsified the docs came on CBS and admitted that
> he falsified them. 

Assuming that you are talking about Bill Burkett, I cannot find that he 
ever did any such thing.

I grant there is a day-old-fish air to his whole story. Nevertheless, to 
the best of my knowledge, no professional forensic document examiner has 
ever ruled on the Killian Papers one way or the other.

-- 
John W. Kennedy
If Bill Gates believes in "intelligent design", why can't he apply it to 
Windows?
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32