On 10/7/2009 12:47 AM, Ed Hulett wrote to Earl Croasmun:

~>  EC> On 10/6/2009 9:52 PM, bob klahn wrote to ALL:
 
~>  ~>>>>  allowed Roy Witt to post venomous posts against
me, even though
~>  ~>>>>  he runs an echo, ham radio
 
~>  EC>>> That would be Thom Lacosta's echo, although I didn't even
~>  EC>>> know of its existence until I looked it up today, and it is
~>  EC>>> not a political discussion echo.
 
~>  ~>>  As of July 12 2009 Roy Witt posted the rules in the Ham echo on
~>  ~>>  Docsplace. He specifically states he does not recognize the
~>  ~>>  claim of anyone else to be moderator or the elist of the echo.
 
~>  EC> Sounds like Klahn disagrees with you!  Klahn recognizes Roy Witt as the
~>  EC> moderator of an echo even though the listing is held by someone else!
~>  EC> Interesting, huh?
 
~> So, using Klahn logic, someone could go into DEBATE or ALL-POLITICS and post
~> new rules and specifically state they do not recognize Klahn's claims of
being
~> moderator or elisted for the echo and it'd be okay with him?

It took me a few tries before I could respond.  Every time I got to the
words "Klahn logic" I had to laugh.

I know nothing about the echo in question, except that Witt does not hold
the listing and yet Klahn recognizes Witt as moderator.  Klahn thinks that
holding the listing does not make someone moderator.  Unless it is HIM
holding a listing, I guess.  Like I said, "Klahn logic" is a funny phrase.
 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a