San Francisco Chronicle Monday, March 28, 1988
"Jonestown Resolution Ignites Debate"
by Larry Liebert Chronicle Washington Bureau Chief
Washington--Commemorating the madness of the mass suicides at
Jonestown a decade ago would hardly seem controversial in a capital
where resolutions are passed by the truckload.
But the approaching 10th anniversary of the carnage that took the
lives of 913 people, mostly from the Bay Area, has revived a bitter
debate over the threat from cults and the threat to religious
freedom posed by anticult crusaders.
The seemingly innocuous resolution that has caused conflict in the
halls of Congress would designate a "Cult Awareness Week" this
November to mark the 10th anniversary of the murders and mass
suicides at the Rev. Jim Jones' cult retreat in Guyana.
The House resolution was introduced by Representative Tom Lantos,
D-San Mateo. His predecessor from the Peninsula, Leo Ryan, was
slain as he led a group to investigate Jones' Guyana retreat.
"We're approaching the 10th anniversary of one of the most ghoulish
and nightmarish tragedies of recent years," said Lantos. "I think
it would have been a dereliction of duty on my part not to remind
the nation."
But the fine print in Lantos' resolution has revived a debate
about cults and religious freedom.
The resolution asserts that there are more than 2,500 cults in the
United States, with 1 million to 3 million members subjected to
"mind-control techniques" ranging from "isolation from friends and
family" to "promotion of total dependency on the group and fear of
leaving it."
Such blanket assertions have angered a coalition of critics
ranging from the American Civil Liberties Union to the Zen master
from Malibu who calls himself Rama.
They charge that the resolution will encourage the coercive
practices of "deprogrammers", who have been known to seize
suspected cult members and pressure them into renouncing their
beliefs. The critics trace the resolution to a group of anticult
crusaders known as the Cult Awareness Network.
"For them to be asking the Congress to denounce 2,500 religious
groups as cults and to make the kind of broad accusations that
resolution makes is clearly an unconstitutional act," said Barry
Lynn, legislative counsel to the American Civil Liberties Union.
"Congress is not in the theology business."
Representatives of the Cult Awareness Network did not return
repeated phone calls. Lantos acknowledged that his staff had worked
on the anti-cult resolution with Ryan's daughter, Patricia, who is
associated with the group.
Now that Lantos' resolution is attracting controversy, the
congressman hinted that he may let it drop without even bringing it
to a House vote. He argued that the resolution has "already
achieved its purpose" by calling attention to the anniversary of
the massacre.
If so, it has also underlined the difficulty of judging when a
religious leader becomes a charlatan and when religious followers
surrender their individuality to a cult.
The most outspoken foe of Lantos' resolution has been Frederick
Lenz, a 38-year-old former English professor who lives in Malibu
and calls himself Zen Master Rama. The ordinarily reclusive
religious leader has been here lobbying for the defeat of the
resolution--and to defend himself against charges that he is just
the sort of cult leader parents should warn their children about.
"Jim Jones was clearly a hustler, charlatan, and madman," said Lenz.
"But that's no excuse to push your own moral and political viewpoint
to interfere with First Amendment rights and engage in illegal
activities.
To make his case, Lenz brought along Jennifer Jacobs, a follower
who says she was kidnapped in an unsuccessful deprogramming attempt.
"They terrified my parents so much that they were willing to put down
$25,000 on the spot to have me kidnaped and psychologically abused,"
said Jacobs. "I was held for 11 days in a seedy motel room in
Seattle, completely against my will."
...
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Origin: ThelemaNet - Hail Eris! * (415) 548-0163 (Opus 1:161/93)
|