Earl Croasmun -> Ross Cassell wrote:
 EC> On 10/6/2009 9:52 PM, bob klahn wrote to ALL:

 ~>>>>  allowed Roy Witt to post venomous posts against me, even though
 ~>>>>  he runs an echo, ham radio

 EC>>> That would be Thom Lacosta's echo, although I didn't even
 EC>>> know of its existence until I looked it up today, and it is
 EC>>> not a political discussion echo.

 ~>>  As of July 12 2009 Roy Witt posted the rules in the Ham echo on
 ~>>  Docsplace. He specifically states he does not recognize the
 ~>>  claim of anyone else to be moderator or the elist of the echo.

 EC> Sounds like Klahn disagrees with you!  Klahn recognizes Roy Witt as the
 EC> moderator of an echo even though the listing is held by someone else!
 EC> Interesting, huh?

So, using Klahn logic, someone could go into DEBATE or ALL-POLITICS and
post new rules and specifically state they do not recognize Klahn's claims
of being moderator or elisted for the echo and it'd be okay with him?

Ed

-- 
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is
to fill the world with fools." --Herbert Spencer

Blogs: http://edsramblings.wordpress.com  | Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/ed.hulett
http://woodcarvingnsuch.wordpress.com     | Twitter: yaesu
http://edsscrollsawbits.blogspot.com

Linux User# 416016
Linux Machine# 379711

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)