On Oct 22, 9:23 pm, Carl Dershem  wrote:
> Kurt Ullman  wrote
innews:kurtullman-5A5E06.16230122102007{at}032-478-847.area7.spcsdns.net:
>
> > In article ,
> >  Carl Dershem  wrote:
>
> >> Had he quoted it as BLS stats that would have made a difference, but
> >> quoting the Heritage Foundation is about as credible as quoting Fox
> >> News.  And that was MY point.
>
> >> cd
>
> >   MY point is that the BLS stats ARE the HF stats. = Same Figures each
> > and every one of them. But for some reason since HF is involved they
> > automatically lose their luster in your mind? Seems VERY closed
> > minded.
>
> no - just experienced.  As said before, HF generally has a reputation as
> bad as Fox News as far as truth is involved.

Dude, Fox News hardly has a monopoly even if they got caught in some
fabrication. Actually fake documents sounds more like the CBS story
that left Dan Rather in trouble. Ironically even big papers and
networks get in hot water over falsifications, and other corporations
(Enron, Worldcom) get it bad if they get caught out. Shouldn't the
entertainment companies have risks at well from getting caught in bad
or false accounting?

> cd
> --
> The difference between immorality and immortality is "T".  I like Earl
> Grey.
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32