~> If you have been told by the MODERATOR of *THIS* echo to take a 
~> vacation then TAKE it.
~> 
~> If you have been told by the MODERATOR of *THIS* echo that you are no 
~> longer welcome to post in this echo, then dont POST.
~> 
~> Just because you dislike the political positions or idioms of the
MODERATOR, 
~> is no excuse to defy him.

Yes, you are taking the only responsible road available.  If you don't
honor legitimate moderator requests then there is anarchy or there are feed
cuts further upstream.

~> Those of you told that you are banned, get over it and move on and dont 
~> reply to me here. If you want to retort to the MODERATORS rants in here, 
~> then you may use the CROSSFIRE echo, he reads it.

Good luck with that.  You realize, of course, that in Klahn's terms that
makes you an "echo saboteur."  And so do the Crossfire rules!



By the way, you made these comments about the "all-politics" echo.  As I
recall, it was created many years ago by John Hull and Stan Hardegree. 
Stan voluntarily relinquished his co-moderatorship and turned the echo over
to John's sole control, just as Peter Bradie relinquished moderatorship of
his echo a few years ago.  Has John ever turned the echo over to a new
moderator?  Has he ever taken action to pull it off the backbone?  Or is it
still his?

Are you elevating the echolist to where it has some official licensing and
credentialing power over the ownership of echoes?  
 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a