SD> comments about y2k in MUFFIN are correct, but if they contradict Gary's
 SD> rules in the MUFFIN FAQ, then his rules supersede what I have written
 SD> here.
 SD> In fact, I do not believe that y2k BUGS are off-topic.  If there is a
 SD> specific problem in Max's y2k support, I certainly want to know about it
 SD> (as do the rest of the sysops).  If you want to drone on and on about
 SD> how Maximus will die in the year 2000 but do not substantiate your
 SD> claims, and thereby antagonize everyone in the conference (while still
 SD> not helping with the problem), you will probably be asked to leave.
Exactly the case.  If someone has a reproducable problem -directly
pertaining- to Maximus or Squish, it's welcome in the MUFFIN and TUB echos.
Discussion about "Y2K" in general, or about other programs, or just
suggestions, rumors, or such other junk are NOT welcome.
 SD> I have heard that there may be some problems with the QWK mail handling
 SD> procedures when the year does hit 2000, but we have not tracked this one
 SD> down, and in any event, this will certainly not be an issue for about
 SD> two years.
And besides this, if there's a problem, it's in the QWK specs.  I'm sure if
they come up with a revised spec, you can easily implement it in Max.
Beyond that, "QWK-2k" wouldn't be a topic here either.
I think were pretty much in sync on what's topical and what's not regarding
this.  :-)
--gary
--- Maximus v3.01               
---------------