Good ${greeting_time}, Markus!

07 Nov 2018 21:01:04, you wrote to me:

 BF>>>> The above clause surely makes it possible to update even Randy's
 BF>>>> outdated documents to present standard.
 ml>>> the above was written by the 2nd incarnation of the FTSC as an
 ml>>> effort to clarify things and avoid problems like we have with
 ml>>> FTS-1... we cannot update or alter FTS-1 without the author's
 ml>>> express permission
 AV>> You possibly can't (you live in US and US legislation applies to
 AV>> you), but others can (personally I can even use portions of old
 AV>> text without breaking Russian laws).
 MR> We could simply write new FTS docs for the different sections of
 MR> FTS-1 and tag FTS-1 "obsoleted by FTS-xxxx, FTS-yyyy ...".

Generally, we should not care of any and all "copyrights". If we need to use
something defined in FTS-0001.016, we'd use it regardless of anything (while
issuing separate FTSes may be desirable for different topics). However, the
resulting FTS-0001.017 is very likely to contain only basic definitions and
references to other documents.


--
Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
gremlin.ru!gremlin; +vii-cmiii-ccxxix-lxxix-xlii

... god@universe:~ # cvs up && make world
--- /bin/vi