0n (16 Aug 05) WAYNE CHIRNSIDE wrote to MIKE ROBERTS...

>> CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS MESSAGE <<

-> the porch, too near the stairs, the dobe would go drag the baby back by the
-> diaper. 

->  WC> Spanky serves as a companion dog for the disabled here and I cannot
->  WC> for the life of me find a single bad habit or incident I'd alter in
->  WC> this loyal, intelligent animal who has repeatedly exhibited the very
->  WC> best of judgement.

-> You know Wayne, I had a Newfoundland like that. He was the best PERSON I ever

-> knew.

 WC> Feel precisely the same here and I've expressed it precisely the same
 WC> way many times.

 Dogs lack vanity. If only more people lacked vanity too... how much more a
happier place the world would be.

You know I have had a question go unanswered. Maybe it's too obscene.
This is a better place to ask it perhaps. The question came up again
when suprisingly enough I saw it referred to by a popular columnist. I
can't be alone in this then.

When our pets are obviously dying do we keep them alive indefinitly by
artificial means? Of course not. We grant them mercy. Why do not
humans accord the same to fellow humans who are dying or proven to be
brain dead?

It realy is a sick world we live in.

Cindy


... A pound of pluck is worth a ton of luck.

--- PPoint 3.01