From: Eric Webner 
Subject: Re: [drakelist] No or very weak audio on TR4


Eric Webner  made an utterence to the drakelist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--0-1679349878-1099447610=:58984
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Shure mic that was so popular: the 444.

Al Parker  wrote:
"Al Parker" made an utterence to the drakelist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Bill,
The plug is OK, same as the switchcraft as far as dimensions, etc. are
concerned. The problem is the mic. If I'm correct, the KW MC50 is a low
impedance mic, and you need a high impedance mic., or I guess you could
use a small mic transformer to transform the impedance. The MC50 can show
output on the scope, and be working properly, but not into a ckt that
requires a high impedance input. You need an older type dynamic or xtal
mic, like an Astatic D-104, or Shure 544 (think that's the shure nr), or
others. -or find the one that came with the rig ;-)
73,
Al, W8UT
New Bern, NC
BoatAnchors appreciated here
http://www.thecompendium.net/radio/
http://www.hammarlund.info


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "billgoodwin" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 12:16 AM
Subject: [drakelist] No or very weak audio on TR4


>
> billgoodwin made an utterence to the drakelist
gang
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> I am trying to get my old TR4 back on the air. I seem to be putting out
> a good rf as shown on my old Philmore SWR meter but am told that my
audio
> is extremely weak and hardly understandable. I lost the Electrostatic
mic
> that came with the rig and replaced it with a Kenwood MC50. I notice the
> manual says a Switchcraft s-230 plug is "required". The chap
who sold me
> the mic did not use this plug. He responded to a question as to plug
> compatibility as follows
>
> The plug I used on the MC-50 is a standard PJ-068 military plug that was
> used by Uncle Sam on Drake and Collins rigs, and has worked fine thru
> the years. There is a switch on the microphone itself that needs to be
> ON, but I am sure you know that. I didn't have a Drake rig to check the
> mic on, but did check it on a scope, and there was output there.
>
> Can any one help me re increasing audio signal, mic plug compatibility
> or anything that will help me get a stronger audio.
>
> Thanks
> Bill
> KD4FGU
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Behalf of billgoodwin 
> Submissions: drakelist{at}www.zerobeat.net
> Unsubscribe: majordomo{at}www.zerobeat.net - unsubscribe drakelist
in body
> Hopelessly Lost: majordomo{at}www.zerobeat.net - help in body of message
> Zerobeat Web Page: http://www.zerobeat.net
> Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net http://www.tlchost.net/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Behalf of "Al Parker" 
Submissions: drakelist{at}www.zerobeat.net
Unsubscribe: majordomo{at}www.zerobeat.net - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost: majordomo{at}www.zerobeat.net - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page: http://www.zerobeat.net
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net http://www.tlchost.net/
----------------------------------------------------------------------


			
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.  www.yahoo.com/a
--0-1679349878-1099447610=:58984
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

Shure mic that was so popular: the
444.Al Parker
<anchor{at}ec.rr.com> wrote:
"Al
Parker" made an utterence to the drakelist
gang----------------------------------------------------------------------Hi
Bill,The plug is OK, same as the switchcraft as far as
dimensions, etc. areconcerned. The problem is the mic. 
---