On 2018 Nov 06 17:32:22, you wrote to Rob Swindell:

 RS>> What I observed was not simple. The message had to split into
 RS>> multiple fragments suitable for reading on 8-bit computers or some
 RS>> such stupidity which disuades contributions from modern
 RS>> technologists.

 MR> The guideline for writing FSPs is stated in FTA-1002
 MR> (http://ftsc.org/docs/fta-1002.003). There is no requirement to split
 MR> up documents into small junks or other such stupidity. It's the
 MR> opposite:

i think he was talking about posting the document in this echo for
discussion... that all went well and there was one last little bit that was to
be fixed and posted once more for a (hopefully final) proofreading... after
that getting the final document to the FTSC via link or file attach or similar
should have put it on the FTSC desk for voting... we simply didn't get to the
last posting in this echo...

after that, another FTSC member tried to bring it up for discussion and that
kinda went quiet after a week or two... then the proposal number was recycled
and assigned to another document so now the one above needs another proposal
number and to be presented again...

yeah, i know :/

)\/(ark

Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it
wrong...
... 93. You're never too old to need your mom.
---