THC>According to my dictionary, the role of the skeptic is to question and 
weig
   >evidence, making a conclusion based on said evidence regardless of 
his/her 
   >personal opinions concerning what is more or less likely.  Hard to do 
that 
   >he disregards some of the evidence and bends some more of it to fit his 
the
   >no? It seems to me that if the evidence pointed towards ET, or even 
imply
   >pointed away from a weather balloon, the skeptic should be willing to 
accep
   >that, and not go into a mental gymnastics routine.
Please Troy, give us some examples of evidence that points towards ET.
---
 þ QMPro 1.02 42-7029 þ PCDOS&MSDOS&CP/M&WINDOWSI'LLFIDDLEWITHOS/2WOULDN'TYOU
---------------