I am going to depart from a primary email post rule and reply to the first
post in a thread that I consider ill informed (I am being polite).

I fly/drive all over this ball (planet). Bloody nuisance by and large.
Great fun and interesting for the first 20 years or so.

The "911" thing and the subsequent hysteria was idiotic at the
Airports. The "professional" screeners repeatedly stopped me, a
50 odd year old freckled Irish male and searched my baggage by hand; next
best bet were Black females older than I, for a search.

Obvious candidates for "round up the usual suspects" walked
through, but they have to have a quota; search the blacks and whites first.

Its a great idea.

Blacks and whites are well known for their adherence to terrorism, so check
them first. Dont check any Arab ever, especially if there is an 80 year old
black or white Lady available to even up the statistics for CNN .



>From a message by Cherokee about Re: OT Military:
> That is oversimplified.  It is not the airlines mandating the searches.
 In fact, the airlines are no longer able to employ their own security
personnel.  The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is the new
government agency handling airport security, and we DO in fact have
less freedom when flying than we used to.

Even so, I say big deal. They are working to protect planes and
passengers from terrorism. They aren't digging through your luggage to
try to find out if you cheated on your taxes.

--- col sanders  wrote:
> 
> Being able to lock your bags on an airplan has nothing to do with 
> freedom.  Airlines are a private company, and as such they have the 
> right to inspect their customers on their private property.
> 
>  wrote:
> 
> >So your saying that ONE SOUL ACT by non-Americans is enough to take
> away
> >some of the freedom of Americans..
> >Does this mean that "IF" these attacks continue that more freedom
> will be
> >lost ..
> >Valid Point of View ..
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "sloppy" 
> >To: 
> >Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:42 PM
> >Subject: [twgsdotorg] Re: OT Military
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>
> >> 
> >>We lost that freedom because a group of
"men" took it upon
> themselves
> >>    
> >>
> >to abuse the system to achieve their goal of killing American
> civilians.
> >  
> >
> >>> 
> >>>That's not the point either ..
> >>>Talk about freedom .. what
happened to the freedom
> of
> >>    
> >>
> >locking your bags ..
> >  
> >
> >>>When you fly now bags stay unlocked ..
> >>>Killing someone doesnt
"Give" freedom either .. so
> you just
> >>    
> >>
> >completely came
> >  
> >
> >>>out and said something that's
just way out there ..
> >>>
> >>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>From: "Sting"

> >>>To: 
> >>>Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 10:11 PM
> >>>Subject: [twgsdotorg] Re: OT Military
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> > SOMEONE HAS TO PAY
FOR YOUR FREEDOM!!
> >>> > BECAUSE IT"S NOT FREE !!!
> >>> > Sting
> >>> > ----- Original Message -----
> >>> > From:
"<>"
> 
> >>> > To: 
> >>> > Sent: Saturday,
January 11, 2003 07:27
> >>> > Subject: [twgsdotorg]
Re: OT Military
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I dont think
that's his point
> >>> > > When it
comes down to it you have to be
> able to
> >>    
> >>
> >handle killing someone
> >  
> >
> >>> > else
> >>> > > just because
it's the political thing to
> do ..
> >>    
> >>
> >If you cant handle that
> >  
> >
> >>> > Idea
> >>> > > then you
shouldnt be in the military
> (Regardless
> >>    
> >>
> >of position)
> >  
> >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > my .02
> >>> > >
> >>> > > -----
Original Message -----
> >>> > > From:
"pagan" 
> >>> > > To:

> >>> > > Sent:
Saturday, January 11, 2003 12:14 PM
> >>> > > Subject:
[twgsdotorg] Re: OT Military
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > You
would be surprized to know that
> the
> >>    
> >>
> >overwhelming majority of
> >  
> >
> >>>service
> >>> > > men and
women never fire a shot outside
> of basic
> >>    
> >>
> >training or a firing
> >  
> >
> >>> > range.
> >>> > > In fact,
there are more opportunities to
> save
> >>    
> >>
> >lives or make living
> >  
> >
> >>> > > conditions
more habitable than to take
> them.
> >>    
> >>
> >Yes, even in an all out war
> >  
> >
> >>> > > situation.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Pagan
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
>From a message by prestone about
> Re: OT
> >>    
> >>
> >Military:
> >  
> >
> >>> > > >
> as long as you don't have a
> problem
> >>    
> >>
> >killing your fellow human
> >  
> >
> >>>beings,
> >>> > go
> >>> > > for it.
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >From a message by sloppy
> about OT
> >>    
> >>
> >Military:
> >  
> >
> >>> > > >
> > With an anticipated
> graduation
> >>    
> >>
> >from college in December, I've
> >  
> >
> >>>been
> >>> > > pondering
what to do from this point on
> in life.
> >>    
> >>
> >I recently hit upon
> >  
> >
> >>>the
> >>> > > idea of the
military, was wondering if
> people
> >>    
> >>
> >could offer input, horror
> >  
> >
> >>> > > stories,
advice, warnings, etc. Anything
> would
> >>    
> >>
> >be appreciated.
> >  
> >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>
Help STOP SPAM: Try the new MSN
> 8 and
> >>    
> >>
> >get" target="new">get">http://g.msn.com/8HMEEN/2016">get 2
months FREE*
> 
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >



--- FEddy 1.4.03/modPHX