In article ,
 Charlie Edmondson  wrote:

> But, this is what they want!  Anyone who has assets available to 
> participate in stocks and real estate is OBVIOUSLY 'rich' and should be 
> taxed more, even if that means that the majority of the country should 
> be taxed more (or especially if that means the majority of the country 
> should be taxed more!)

     People should be careful what they wish for in this context anyway. 
Who do think is hurt more by all the deduction restrictions put in when 
the "three martini lunch" was the cause du jour.... the honchoes or the 
poor shmuck traveling salesman or consultant?
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32