Dennis Lee Bieber  wrote:
>   I ran a benchmark about two+ years ago which required significant swap
> space to complete; otherwise the Out-of-Memory monitor would kill it
> (somewhat strange, since the program was designed to take a failure from
> malloc() as signal to shut down and report results -- and that part worked
> on a No-OS embedded system).

Why would malloc() fail if there was swap space?


--
You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a
kind word alone.

Al Capone

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05