>If he had criticised gun proliferation, would you have produced this
article?
> Of course not.  You have minimal interest in discovering the truth,
>examining the causes, or addressing the problem. Your first priority is to
>protect your guns, and you will pick and choose from opinions expressed in
>order to do so.  Your opponents will do the same.  Any truths are lost
among
>the shouting.


What difference does it make.  It would still be a part of the congressional
record.