On 01-20-09, ROSS SAUER said to TIM RICHARDSON:


RS>> - Tim Richardson, Christian


RS>> - TIM RICHARDSON


RS>> - Tim Richardson, Christian


TR> Here again you got it wrong.


TR> In two different post of mine which you quote here....you attach the
TR> title `Christian' after my name.


RS>I didn't put that there.


RS>Rice did.


RS>I would have wrote it "Christian."


You'd have been wrong yet again. Even the Christians I work with and for, who
I socialize with regularly, most likely would not label me as such. Rice
(`both' of them) is an idiot, almost as low-brow as you are (about the only
thing that puts either Rice brother a couple of cuts above you is the fact
that both are probably working, supporting themselves).



TR> First of all......I want to thank you for doing so, as I would far
TR> rather be identified with the group known as *Christians*, than with
TR> any group you or your Fido friends belong to.


RS>You aren't a Christian.


I have never claimed to be. Nor do I now. I in fact *DIS*claim any modicum of
`Christianity' in my philosophy.


RS>You go through the motions,


I do no such thing. I haven't set foot in a church for the purpose of taking
part in a religious service since my wife died. I do not sing hymns, I do no
`praying', nor do I throw my life efforts and\or fortunes upon any Divine
Deity.


You aren't just wrong on this particular subject.......you are out in left
field without a fielder's mitt.


RS>but your lies about me (including the paragraph below,)


There is no reason to `lie' about you on any level. Nobody in their right mind
would try to `lie' about you when using the `truth' against you (which you
yourself so readily supply) is far more effective


RS>and your frothing RS>hatred of "HOMOS"


The "HOMOS" you refer to are trying to re-define American society in a very
detrimental way. And have been for many decades.


I do not *hate* "HOMOS" (that is something *you* falsely ascribed to me
without foundation); but I strongly disapprove of their attempts to `push' a
degenerate outlook into the upbringing of our youth, and their attempts to
`legitimize' themselves, by dragging American mainstream society down to their
level.


And I refuse to cease refering to `homosexuality' in any derogatory or
insulting manner that I think fits the occassion, any time I choose.


After all.....`they' are free to call me a `straight', or a `hetero' all they
want. I take to insult or offense at being called by what I am; a *hetero*.
...or a `straight'; why should they take offense at being called what `they'
are; a `homo'....or `degenerate'.


After all.....was it not *you* who refered to Larry Craig as a `degenerate'?


Since we had this discussion (I raise the exchanges we had in this echo up a
considerable distance by refering to them as 1a discussion') here in this
echo, with the likes of Bandsma, Nonken, Alexander, Springett, Chirnside,
Ceppa, and various others, many things I predicted back then have since come
to pass:


Using terms like `Faggot', or `Homo' is considered hate-speech. If you bother
to notice.....there is much pushing of `tolerance of things Homosexual' in our
schools, just as I predicted over 15 years ago.


If you get into a fist fight with a homosexual, beat the livin' shit out of
him (exactly what `he' intended to do to you), and it is alleged that you
kicked his ass `because he's a homosexual......if you are convicted (and the
chances of that are huge, no matter that *he* started the fight to begin
with), you will recieve a sentence that is *enhanced* in severity as a result
(it will be considered a 1hate crime').


Within ten years from now, "HOMOS" will have far more civil
rights than non-
homosexuals (they almost do now).


I do not hate "HOMOS"....I `do' hate what they are doing to our
society, not
to mention the message of re-definition of normalcy sent to our children.


You lie with the regularity of the phases of the Moon.....and try to imply
that your enemies who catch you in your lies (so regularly its become a Fido
joke!), are liars for having done so.


You spew out hate-filled statements, like:


"We don't want that n***** in the White House." ........Otto Sauer


Or:


"Wahhhh!!! That n***** isn't going to be president!" .......Otto Sauer


and have the audacity to call others `racist'! Even your buddy Klahn has gone
silent in the face of this.


RS>.....and Arabs say otherwise.


I remember the vivid images of the two aircraft slamming into the twin towers
of the World Trade center. I hear the people running screaming from the smoke
and falling debris; I can still see the smoking crater in my mind's eye, and
hear the toll of the dead and injured.


I have not forgotten your little epithet aimed at one of the victims on one of
the jumbojets that slammed into one of the towers.


They water-boarded prisoners in various lock-ups for terrorist captives and
elicited information that was used to make this country safe. I got no problem
with that. If it were up to me, it would be a lot worse than just
`waterboarding'.


I also recall that it was *YOU* who first took the news of the death of Stan's
son into DUMBUNDER in the first place.....and you knew exactly what sort of
resopnse would come from your bringing Stan up in there now.


TR> Secondly, nothing I've ever said to you or any of your friends, either
TR> in normal conversation or in anger, comes even close to equaling the
TR> low-life trick you pulled against Stan Hardegree, posting up in a
TR> forum he isn't a member of, and causing the exact comments about his
TR> son you *knew* would be forthcoming.


RS>I didn't know. You want to pretend I did, fine. I don't share your
RS>psychosis.


Disclaim it all you want......you did it, you had a good idea what would
happen, and now you own it.






---
*Durango b301 #PE*