at 08:06, Thu 29/Jan/1998, Harry Oldenhuis wrote to Sander Nijhof:
[...]
SN> transfer files, I'm just trying to make a point here:
SN> to be able to tag 32 files at max, isn't giving you a
SN> lot of tag space.
SN> But it's more than 10 I guess, so it could have been worse.. .
HO> That depends on how you look at it,
ofcoz.
HO> About two years ago we had that same problem, maximus was allowing
HO> you to tag 32 file,
correction: is (still) alowing you to (only) tag 23 files at a time.
HO> alot of Sysops complained ( self included ) We
HO> wanted the user to explore the BBS, use the echos,
HO> Find out the other things you have on the BBS, Games, chat to other
HO> users But most of all Call back and dont be a file leach
Stupid sysops. My purpose is to make a users stay as pleasant as possible! I
did not start a board to give users a hard time trying to get around or
explore a BBS. Esspecialy now internet is more populair.
HO> The files are still there tomorrow.
Yes, but I'm calling today and I want it today, not tomorrow.
HO> Looking at some of those leaches here they all started a BBS and
HO> have since closed down.
I can imagine.
HO> There is more to a BBS that files you know.
Eh, yes, I'd like to consider myself a sysop, remember?
HO> If I could set that file linit to 10 I would do so
HO> and so would a lot of others
Exactly, but you cannot set the number of files, it's hardcoded. :-(
10 files eh? Yes, that is why most systems suck! they nver heard of 'F R E E
D O M'. I hate limited software.
Deffenin' greetz,
Sander
---
---------------
* Origin: Hi-Fidelity: New Polution (2:283/304)
|