No, I buy that argument that killing 150,000 people to save probably close 
to 1 million US troops and 4-5 million Japanese is a fair tradeoff.  If you 
don't buy that, then you are saying that it isn't a good trade for a cop to 
sacrifice himself to save 33 hostages?

>
>If you buy that argument then you also buy the argument of killing every
>last person Now .. in 20 years time the population will be much higher than
>now .. so a large WMD fest Then will yeild large results compared to Now ..
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "sloppy" 
>To: 
>Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 1:15 AM
>Subject: [twgsdotorg] Re: OT Military
>
>
> >
> > Yes,
but there is also a
>difference between indiscriminate use of WMD, as opposed to our use which 
>in
>the long run saved Japan and the US both from possible millions of
>casualties that an invasion of Japan
would've caused.
clear=all>MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and href="2" target="new">2">http://g.msn.com/8HMDEN/2017">2 months
FREE* 
> >


_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

--- FEddy 1.4.03/modPHX