Hi Murray,

>> My advice now would be to get to the current version of OS/2.

>> I second that advice. FP12 serves me as well as it does RH.

> Nonsense!  Even assuming that FixPak 12 is bug free (which I doubt),
> there is no value to me in applying a FixPak to a system that isn't
> broken (as far as my usage is concerned) unless it adds new function
> that I would find to be useful (which none since Warp 4 FixPak 5 have
> done).  You and RH may get pleasure from being able to brag that you are
> operating at the highest Warp level.  But I spent too many years being
> paid to live on computing's bleeding edge to do it for fun.  AFAIAC, the
> tagline is still valid.

My memory may be failing, but I thought it was FP6 which made Warp4 Y2K
compliant. (However, it may have been FP5... in which case you are alright). I 
think this may have been the concern of some of the mail you have received.
Other than that, I'm a firm believer in the old adage "if it ain't broke,
don't fix it" (I've done it too many times myself).

Stu/2

--- BBBS/2 v3.50 Flag-A