"Dustin"  wrote in message 
news:XnsA35CA4CF86DC9X238BHEUFHHI5RJ791@94.75.214.90...
>
[snip]
>
>Malwarebytes also chews up a good portion of ram due to a design flaw in
>it's engine. A design flaw they've known about since I was hired on and
>pointed it out to them, years ago! I complained about it to no end too. [g]
>
>I was trying to save Marcin alot of time and aggravation. He'll have to
>implement those design changes at some point and years ago would have been
>alot easier than now. The database has been culled several times now due to
>this design issue; to reduce memory consumption.
[snip]


Just checked my Pro MBAM (ver: 1.75.0.1300) the memory usage on my Win7 HE 
64 bit system running in real time, not doing a scan, and it is aprox 370MB 
of ram. WoW!  WOW!!
mbamgui.exe *32 = 11.MB
mbamservice.exe *32 = 254MB
mbamscheduler.exe *32 = 107MB

Never realized how much it used just doing real time protection.
While running a full scan with high priority:          Almost  600MB of ram.
mbamgui.exe *32 = 11MB
mbamservice.exe *32 = 254MB
mbamseceduler.exe *32 = 107MB
mbam.exe *32  = 227MB


-- 
Buffalo 

--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2