From: Rich Gauszka
I understand the point you are making. Unfortunately, like it or not, DRM
and Activation are starting to be used interchangeably in everyday use ( as
in the Infoworld Gripeline blog )
Rich wrote:
> This is neither a content nor a service which is one reason I
> questioned the use of DRM. I think the new subject is appropriate.
>
> Rich
>
>
> "Rich Gauszka" > wrote in message
> news:45e4b05e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> It's an inane activation scheme. From Microsoft's own definition one
> could make the case that Adobe's activation is a content owner setting
> the business rules of a file ( a program in this case ). Most would use
> 'activation' for clarity in this context - so Subject changed
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/security/glossary.mspx#d
>
> digital rights management (DRM)
>
> Any technology used to protect the interests of owners of content and
> services (such as copyright owners). Typically, authorized
> recipients or
> users must acquire a license in order to consume the protected
> material—files, music, movies—according to the rights or business rules
> set by the content owner.
>
>
> Rich wrote:
> > What does this have to do with DRM? Or do you use DRM for
> everything
> > from actual DRM to encrypted email to password protected ZIP
> files to
> > SSL/TLS?
> >
> > Rich
> >
> >
> > "Rich Gauszka"
> > > wrote in message
> > news:45e4792a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > Adobe - If you use a disk defragger the activation doesn't
> like it?
> >
> >
> http://weblog.infoworld.com/gripeline/archives/2007/02/acrobat_activat.ht
ml
> > when it comes to stupid IT designs as far as the activation
> issues I
> > encountered with Adobe. I upgraded from Acrobat 7.0 to 8.0,
> because the
> > demos and features looked great. After installing it, I didn't
> > really use it
> > for a few months. Then I went to use it and it said it was not
> > activated."
> >
> >
> > When the reader went to the menu, he was puzzled to see both the
> > "Activate'
> > and "Deactivate' buttons turned off. "Seems stupid --
> shouldn't one
> > always
> > be highlighted?" the reader wondered. "After calling in,
> Adobe told
> > me to
> > run the repair function. I did, and it worked for one day,
> and then
> > it was
> > deactivated again and both buttons were off again. I called again
> > and waited
> > on hold forever to be told to uninstall and reinstall. So I
> > uninstalled and
> > it deactivated. I went to reinstall and it said I did not have an
> > original
> > product to upgrade from. Wow, like I'm supposed to keep all
> > hundred-plus key
> > codes I've ever had from Adobe. So after about 3 more people
> and a
> > lot more
> > time on the phone I got around the installation and activated
> again
> > with a
> > temp key. Then within hours it deactivated again."
> >
> >
> > The reader then entered a support nightmare from which he is
> yet to
> > awaken.
> > For weeks on end, tech after tech would tell him to run the
> repair
> > function
> > and reinstall. When that wouldn't work, the techs would begin
> > speculating as
> > to what changes he should make to him computer to placate the
> > activation
> > gods. "Gee, the guy would say, why do you need to mirror your
> hard
> > drive?"
> > the reader wrote. "Then they send me to another and
the guy says,
> > gee, if
> > you upgrade or restore your drive, or change your
> configuration, or
> > backup
> > to Ghost, or use a RAID array, or use a disk defragger, the
> activation
> > doesn't like it. Then they start asking why I need to do these
> > things, which
> > is none of their business."
> >
> >
> > Some of the Adobe techs mentioned that what the reader really
> needed
> > to fix
> > the activation problem was "Patch 2.70."
Unfortunately, it seems
> > Patch 2.70
> > is not provided to just any old Acrobat customer, and the
> reader had to
> > supplicate his way up the support ladder to find someone who
> could
> > authorize
> > sending it to him. "I finally get to the right guy
and he asks me
> > why I need
> > it and why I can't stop mirroring and defragging and using Ghost.
> > Finally he
> > says he'll escalate the issue and I'll have an e-mail in 24
> hours.
> > Next day
> > there's no e-mail so I call back. It was never escalated and
> I have
> > to start
> > the process of filing to get the patch all over again."
> >
> >
> > The reader is a stubborn man, though, and he eventually prevailed
> > upon Adobe
> > to send him Patch 2.70. It didn't help. Several more weeks of
> > escalations to
> > supervisors and higher levels of Adobe support have followed,
> without
> > success. Last week Adobe promised to send him a copy of Acrobat -
> > presumably
> > the corporate version - that would get around the problem.
> But at last
> > report it still hasn't shown, so the reader's copy of Acrobat
> 8 remains
> > deactivated.
> >
> >
> > "The amount of time, support, and money that Adobe and I have
> wasted
> > on this
> > is crazy," the reader wrote. "I understand
protecting your
> product, but
> > these people have gone way overboard with this activation that's
> > tied so
> > closely to the hardware that you can't do anything that doesn't
> > upset it.
> > Many people back up, restore, defrag and mirror disks and
> many more
> > will do
> > so as the prices come down. I think Adobe needs to clean some
> > management
> > house, toss out this stupid activation process, and get something
> > that works
> > instead of the runaround."
> >
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267
@PATH: 379/45 1 633/267
|