Hello Maurice,

On 20 Nov 16 16:13, Maurice Kinal wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 MK> The one you are replying to yes.  I thought I'd try it to see if I
 MK> recieved it with the special spaces intact at this end.  Unfortunetly
 MK> it never made it and is still MIA along with many others.  :-/

 MK> Anyhow I don't think it is you that is causing the oddball hard wraps
 MK> I see in the messages that do make it through.  Beats me where it is
 MK> happening and I am giving up trying to figure out a proper 'fix' for
 MK> it.

 MK> For the record this reply is via the 'normal' channel and isn't being
 MK> wrapped. All paragraphs are unbounded as per specs for packed
 MK> messages.

 MK> {at}PATH: 153/7001 7715 250 770/1 280/464 154/10

This one arrived here hardwrapped. I'm fairly certain 770/1 (FastEcho) is
not doing this, and am certain it's not 280/464 (FMail) or 154/10 (me,
HPT), so you have 2 other prospects. You may want to try your direct uplink
(153/7715, or maybe even 153/250) and see what BBS software package they're
using (In my experience with this, it's usually an old BBS software that
does this, unless a tosser is specifically configured to do so).

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160827