TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: guns
to: ALL
from: `RedFish`
date: 2002-03-24 21:28:53
subject: Re: SARAH BRADY BROKE NO GUN LAWS

Sarah Brady took her grief for her husband and translated that into
something evil.  Something *SHE believed should be pressed onto every other
American citizen simply because *She thought it should be.  She determined
that SHE was right and everyone else was wrong.
And from that initiated steps to take away the Constitutional rights of
everyone.

Break a *gun* law?  Perhaps not.....but she did break a multitude of other
*laws.
Just as Hitler and Hussein structured societies to suit *their beliefs and
ideas.....Brady is no less guilty.
Just as a thief will steal money in cases where they *believe it is owed
them because of what society has "done to them"; Sarah Brady has stolen
ethics, morals, safety and lives from millions and millions of innocent
citizens because she felt she was "owed" something as well.

She should be imprisoned no more or less than the man who shot her
husband....because in effect, she took the very *same weapon that the
shooter had and attempted to kill everyone else with it.

Thank God common sense prevailed in the end....but that makes her no less
the guilty.

--
Randy RedFish
.

.
"Joan Hampton"  wrote in message
news:778fa5cb.0203241751.52956de3@posting.google.com...
> Sarah Brady did NOT break any gun laws - she didn't even come close.
> The New York Daily News published a retraction on Saturday totally
> taking the blame for their mistake.  Here's what they said:
>
> CORRECTION
>
> A story in some early editions of yesterday's Daily News incorrectly
> reported that gun-control advocate Sarah Brady may have skirted
> Delaware's gun laws when she bought a rifle for her adult son but did
> not declare who was going to own the weapon.
>
> The Delaware Department of Justice initially insisted to The News that
> gun purchasers must declare who the weapon was intended for so that
> person's background could be checked. Yesterday, a spokeswoman for the
> Delaware Department of Justice said it misinterpreted the law and that
> Brady was not obligated to state that the gun was for her son as long
> as he was legally qualified to own a firearm. In addition, a spokesman
> for Brady said, "Sarah Brady told the gun store that the gun was for
> her son and filled out the forms that they asked her to fill out."
>
> The News regrets the error.

SOURCE: alt.fidonet via archive.org

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.