0n (15 Feb 08) Richard Webb wrote to Jason Vierik...

 RW> following up a message from Cindy Haglund to Jason Vierik:

CH> ((Also it's a common practice in replying to delete the origin lines
CH> of the person one is replying to, for the same reason. An
CH> uncluttered message is easier on the eyes.))

 RW> IT's also customary not to top post over the message to which you're

 Yes sir! but we get lazy now and then don't we? Can we be forgiven
now and then a small transgression such as that as long as it's only a
line or two? (and the quoted material only a line or three...
..............


 RW> For those still may be downloading mail and moving it
 RW> via toll calls, or who pay for bandwidth it also saves on that.  YEs,

People still do that? Good to know.

 RW> I noted in your reply to ROger you top posted and quoted the entire
 RW> message.

  Now THAT I agree is annoying. Too many quotes as opposed to none at
all. I got after one somebody about that once and while he was okay on
it I got bit off by somebody ELSE. So I suspect the best thing to do
is if somebody's posting style is annoying perhaps the only recourse
is to overlook it or the message all together.

Cind


... "Other things just make you swear and curse..."-M.Python

--- PPoint 3.01