EG> GK> Ted Hendricks, Lyle Alzado, Otis Sistrunk, John Matuzak, etc..
EG> GK> Fallacy?
EG>1. Alzado was sent to Cleveland over a salary dispute. The Raiders got him
EG>because the Browns were cleaning house after their disappointing 5-11
season
EG>1981.
EG>2. Hendricks was shipped to Green Bay in 1974 because he signed a future
EG>contract with a WFL team (Ask our man from Baltimore, Alan Hess, about
me
EG>3. Matuzak DIDN'T sign a future contract with the WFL, he signed *A*
contrac
EG>with them and played 1 season. After it folded, he went to KC and a year
und
EG>4. Sistrunk was one of their "own."
EG>Fallacy? I think that you just proved it.
Huh??? None of your reply disproves the "malcontent" image of a
typical Raider, or that that type of player was attracted too, and
preferred by the Oakland Raiders.
.
---
þ SLMR 2.0 #1330 þ HCI (Have Criminal Intensions)
--- FLAME v1.1
---------------
* Origin: Telnet toltbbs.com or call 313-854-6001, Boardwatch #55 (1:234/2)
|