01 Mar 08 08:43, TOM WALKER wrote to ROY WITT:


 RW>> TW> That ability is VERY frequency Dependent. At the Cell phone
 RW>> power
 RW>> TW> levels and frequency there is little to NO human tissue heating.

 RW>> Would you bet your life or even your health on that?

 TW> Thus my inclusion of Little. Cel phones have been arround long enough
 TW> to provide some conclusions of NO damage.

The IEEE, IEC and CENELEC all disagree with your conclusion.

"Because of "adaptive power control", a handset normally
operates at less
than maximum power, if the signal from the base station if sufficiently
strong. Any protective device that interferes with communication between
the handset and the base station may cause the handset to increase its
output. In other words, a protective device might actually increase the
user's exposure to RF energy, over what it would have been had it not been
used at all."

http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/embs/comar/protective.htm

You might want to look up the definition of APC before you read the rest
of this article. Cell Phone technology such as this is mandated by many
world wide governments.

 TW> OF course that is an Average. The 24/7 glued to the ear type vI don't
 TW> care about. They are a hazard to society and most(NOT ALL) have NO
 TW> social Redeming value.

Never the less, they must be protected as well. Not doing so means that
those of us who are suvivors, have to pay more than just their medical
bills.

                R\%/itt



--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000