| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: The Stone Rose: my review |
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho.moderated
From Address: nospam_nov03{at}jhall.co.uk
Subject: Re: The Stone Rose: my review
In article
,
"jphalt{at}aol.com" writes:
>And when the Doctor reveals that he can
>restore Rose - but only in her current condition, chipped and missing
>one arm - Mickey wonders how likely Rose is to agree that this is
>"better than no Rose at all."
Maybe it shows that I'm heartless, but I confess that I laughed at the
thought of Rose being restored minus an arm.
>Worse still, it takes the plot
>out of Doctor Who territory
Isn't one of the programme's great strengths that pretty much anything
can be Doctor Who territory?
Anyway, thanks for the - as always - interesting review.
--
John Hall
"I look upon it, that he who does not mind his belly,
will hardly mind anything else."
Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-84)
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux
* Origin: home (1:2320/105.97)* Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1) SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 640/954 712/0 313 550 620 848 @PATH: 2320/105 0/0 261/38 712/848 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.