03 Mar 08 07:02, TOM WALKER wrote to ROY WITT:


 RW>> bk>  Be a bit of a risk for CO poisioning.

 RW>> Not at all. Route the exhaust through a large plenum that can keep
 RW>> the bathroom warm 24/7. Or up the old furnace chimney if you don't
 RW>> want to bother.

 TW> Plus he CO risk is very low for a Diesel Engine becaue they burn the
 TW> fule Very effecntl.
 TW> A far bigger hazard would be the Particulate Carbon in the Exhaust
 TW> it was not directed outdoors.

That in and of itself is a big problem. I hate diesel soot.

 RW>> I think there's a false economy in diesel. It's priced at least 50
 RW>> cents higher than gasoline, yet the fuel mileage isn't that much
 RW>> greater over a gasoline engine. The diesel maintenence factor with
 RW>> more frequent oil and filter changes, including fuel filters makes
 RW>> it about even if not moreso than a gasoline engine...

 TW> With the Fuel Companies serious Raping the Littel guy on Diesel
 TW> Prices YES it is a LOOSING situation. Teh Diesel increased effecency
 TW> is more them negitaded by the Higher Cost of hte Fuel. From an Actual
 TW> Production though the cost Diesel should be equal to or a bit less
 TW> then Unleaded regular.

Only being cracked twice compared to 7 or 8 for gasoline, it would be a
lot cheaper.

                R\%/itt



--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000