Consider where you currently live. Consider what percentage
of people living in your area would have to die, in order to
reach such an astounding number. It's really shocking, isn't
it? Why? Because there are not enough people living in your
area, or even in your entire state, to reach that horrific
number. Exactly how large is 46,000,000? Well, let's make a
few quick and easy comparisons. The 2007 population of the
state of California, which happens to be the most populated
state in the USA, was 36.5 million people. That means that
for the purposes of this comparison, the entire population
of that huge state has been slaughtered through abortion, in
addition to about another 25% of the population beyond that,
since abortion became legal in 1973. In other words, roughly
125% of the entire population of California would have to be
slaughtered, in order to equal the number of abortions which
have been performed in the USA, since Roe v. Wade became the
law of the land in 1973.

Here is an equally astounding comparison. According to 2007
population figures, the huge state of Texas comes in second
with over 23.9 million inhabitants. That means that double
the entire population of Texas has been slaughtered through
the act of abortion, since 1973. Let us not forget that this
state is where the Roe v. Wade battle began. Let us also not
forget that the 46 million figure only represents the known
number of legal abortions. How many illegal ones have there
been?

Now can you better comprehend the full scope of this problem?
No one ever heard those 46 million voices. No one ever felt,
or saw, their pain. They were just gone. They were horribly
burned by a salt solution; sliced up like a worthless hunk
of meat; shredded and sucked up before the evidence could be
seen; and discarded. And America, and the world, continue in
this grotesque, detestable practice year after year, without
blinking an eye. Oh, how God must weep! Speaking of the pain
which fetuses are now scientifically known to feel, you won't
believe what one person wrote to me a few years ago regarding
this sensitive issue. After referring to an embryo as a "ball
of cells", they said:

----- Begin Quote -----

"Well, perhaps the cells do have the ability to feel, but at
that stage of development, it wouldn't have a brain to
interpret such signals. I think the issue of the one-month
old fetus feeling pain is irrelevant."

----- End Quote -----

Either this person was purposely being downright deceptive,
or else they are ignorant of the fact that at least 42% of
all abortions performed in the United States occur after the
first month of gestation; and the longer that a woman waits
to have her abortion, the more likely that the fetus is able
to feel pain as it is being ripped apart by the abortionist.

When U.S. Government figures take public office, they often
place their hand upon a Bible, and swear to uphold the laws
and ideals of the United States, as are set forth in the US
Constitution, and other legal documents. In similar fashion,
most members of the medical profession, upon entering their
chosen field of practice, take a similar oath which is known
as the "Hippocratic Oath". This oath, which is believed to
have been written by Hippocrates, the father of medicine, in
4th century BC Greece, sets down in writing the ethics of all
medical practitioners. Translated from Greek, it states the
following:

----- Begin Quote -----

"I swear by Apollo, Asclepius, Hygieia, and Panacea, and I
take to witness all the gods, all the goddesses, to keep
according to my ability and my judgment, the following Oath.

To consider dear to me, as my parents, him who taught me
this art; to live in common with him and, if necessary, to
share my goods with him; To look upon his children as my own
brothers, to teach them this art.

I will prescribe regimens for the good of my patients
according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to
anyone.

I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if I am asked, nor
will I advise such a plan; and similarly I will not give a
woman a pessary to cause an abortion.

But I will preserve the purity of my life and my arts.

I will not cut for stone, even for patients in whom the
disease is manifest; I will leave this operation to be
performed by practitioners, specialists in this art.

In every house where I come I will enter only for the good
of my patients, keeping myself far from all intentional
ill-doing and all seduction and especially from the
pleasures of love with women or with men, be they free or
slaves.

All that may come to my knowledge in the exercise of my
profession or in daily commerce with men, which ought not to
be spread abroad, I will keep secret and will never reveal.

If I keep this oath faithfully, may I enjoy my life and
practice my art, respected by all men and in all times; but
if I swerve from it or violate it, may the reverse be my
lot."

----- End Quote -----

Please notice the line that clearly states ". . . I will not
give a woman a pessary to cause an abortion." Clearly then,
as I stated earlier, medical professionals who perform, or
assist in, an abortion, are in direct violation of their own
creed. Could this possibly be one of the reasons why some of
them now even refuse to recognize the oath; that is, because
they know that they have no intentions of fully keeping it?

Every four years, as mandated by the U.S. Constitution and
the laws of the United States, the people of America elect a
new president. At the time that Roe v. Wade became the law of
the land, Richard M. Nixon was the president of the USA. He
was forced to resign in August of 1974, due to the Watergate
scandal, at which time Gerald Ford, then the vice president,
became the new president. From that time until today, there
have been nine four-year presidential cycles; yet in spite of
the fact that thirty-six years have passed, Roe v. Wade has
never been overturned, and we should wonder why this is so.

As is common knowledge within the United States, the issue of
abortion has repeatedly played a central role, and has had a
very direct effect, on who becomes the next president of the
United States. Would-be presidents know that if they want to
assume the office of the president, they must win the support
of their constituents, whether they are pro-lifers, or else
pro-abortionists. Concerning the more conservative Republican
Party, this has usually meant taking a strong stand against
abortion. As recent American history reveals, it was because
George W. Bush catered to the Christian Right, and came out
against abortion, embryonic stem cell research and same-sex
"marriages", that he won the presidential race in 2000, and
then again in 2004, in spite of the fact that he dragged the
United States into the illegal Iraq War, based on deception
and lies.

However, as I explain in the four-part series "Obama, McCain
And The Bush Legacy", despite their high expectations, even
after eight years of the Bush Administration, Christians in
America are saddened to see that abortions still occur on a
daily basis throughout the country. Furthermore, soon a much
more liberal president, who has tried to straddle the fence
regarding abortion, and who has in fact done nothing which
opposes abortion, will be moving into the White House. I am
of course referring to President-elect Barack Hussein Obama.
To clarify what I mean, please consider the following data
regarding Mr. Obama:

1. He supports Roe v. Wade.

2. He voted against prohibiting minors from crossing state
lines in order to obtain an abortion.

3. He voted against notifying parents of minor children who
obtain out-of-state abortions.

4. He is undecided on whether or not life begins at
conception.

5. He voted against banning partial-birth abortions.

6. He stated that we should trust women to make their own
decisions regarding partial-birth abortion.

Equally alarming is the fact that President-Elect Obama has
made it quite clear that one of his very first acts as the
new president of the United States, in addition to dealing
with the current economic crisis, will be to sign into law
the so-called "Freedom Of Choice Act", or FOCA, once the US
Congress has presented it to him for his signature. In fact,
in July of 2007, while speaking to the Planned Parenthood
Action Fund, Barack Obama, then a U.S. senator, stated the
following; and you can be certain that Planned Parenthood is
going to hold Obama to his promise:

----- Begin Quote -----

"The first thing I'd do as president is sign the Freedom of
Choice Act. That's the first thing that I'd do."

----- End Quote -----



Jeff Snyder, SysOp - Armageddon BBS  Visit us at endtimeprophecy.org port 23
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your Download Center 4 Mac BBS Software & Christian Files.  We Use Hermes II


--- Hermes Web Tosser 1.1