MSGID: 2:292/854 0a1f3845
I get mail of mine mirrored/re-exported back by someone using crappy software
and/or not knowing what he's doing.
 
New date, new time, new msgid ... good job.
 
Thank you very much, Joseph Larson of 1:340/800...
 
 MSGID: 1:340/800.0 c03a1153
 PID: Imp-Mail 2.01
 TID: hpt/dpmi-djgpp 1.9.0-cur 24-06-16
 
 \%/@rd
 
*****************************************************************************
Date: 29 Dec 17  09:40:38
From: Ward Dossche
  To: Dale Shipp
Subj: Re: Future Applications
____________________________________________________________________________
MSGID: 2:292/854 09344365
REPLY: 1:261/1466.0 5a45d9a4
 
Dale,
 
DS> What I was talking about was examples where it was quite clear that an
DS> item was optional, but someone insisted that people were not in
DS> compliance if they did not implement it.
 
I got the point. Thank you for the clarification.
 
 \%/@rd
 
-+- D'Bridge 3.99 SR16
 * 0rigin: Resist-Insist-Persist-Enlist / onwardtogether.org (2:292/854)
P@TH: 292/854
*****************************************************************************
Date: 04 Jan 18  08:13:23
From: Ward Dossche
  To: Dale Shipp
Subj: Re: Future Applications
____________________________________________________________________________
MSGID: 1:340/800.0 c03a1153
PID: Imp-Mail 2.01
TID: hpt/dpmi-djgpp 1.9.0-cur 24-06-16
 
 
Dale,
 
DS> What I was talking about was examples where it was quite clear that an
DS> item was optional, but someone insisted that people were not in
DS> compliance if they did not implement it.
 
I got the point. Thank you for the clarification.
 
 \%/@rd
 
-+- D'Bridge 3.99 SR16
 * 0rigin: Resist-Insist-Persist-Enlist / onwardtogether.org (2:292/854)
P@TH: 340/800 154/10 221/6 1 292/854
*****************************************************************************

--- D'Bridge 3.99 SR16