LL> We have a man here in the USA, a former president, who is about
 LL> to be put on trial

   His only defence seems to be that the trial is unconstitutional because he
is no longer president. What kind of crazy talk is that? After all, he
committed the crime when in office. The House voted to impeach him while he was
still in office.

   Imagine a chief accountant that is caught embezzling and is charged with the
crime, and then he is fired. On his trial he claims the the trial is
unconstitutional because he no longer works for the company in question.

   What kind of crazy talk is that? He'd probably do better by claiming
insanity. That'll probably work for Trump as well, there are many witnesses
that can confirm that he was -- and still is -- insane.



..

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125