-=> Quoting Hans Mangold to MICHAEL SHARON <=-
 HM> Yes, and it is in fact a multi-tasker.  Finally I can run my BBS
 HM> properly while still enjoying the rest of the computer; under Win 3.1,
 HM> this was virtually impossible.  Some sysops used "crutches" like
 HM> DesqView, others, like myself, switched to OS/2 to get the benefit of
 HM> efficient multi-tasking.  Many (most?) who have gone that route have
 HM> since looked at all of the compromises and decided Win95 was, on
 HM> balance, the best choice.  Win95 has a lot of drawbacks, but, as I
 HM> said, on balance, it is the preferred choice for most PC users today. 
 
 Hello Hans,
 Windows '95 has been very good for running my board and using it's
 built in networking has allowed me to easily setup my own LAN. 
 WIN '95 is not perfect, but it works better than 3.1.  I wish IBM
 had done a better job marketing OS/2 so MS would have some real
 competition in the marketplace and the consumers would have more
 choices.
 
                          Regards, 
                        Craig Klingel
... USR V.Everything...When You Care Enough To Send The Best Carrier.
--- Film At 11: Elvis in the U.F.O.
---------------