On 08-01-09, ROSS SAUER said to TIM RICHARDSON:


RS>> You see, in conservafairyland, being a liar under oath is *NOBLE*
RS>> at least RS>according to Dick Cheney.


TR> Clinton lied under oath and you never said a word of protest!


RS>We're not talking about Bill Clinton. That was 10 years ago and has been
RS>settled and done with.


Then why bring up Cheney or bush? Neither one of them are in power anymore.
Thats last year's news. This is 2009, and Hussein Obama is the president.


RS>Only the frothing nutcases like the "Clinton Body
RS>Count" FTB's are still at it.


Only the frothing nutcases who fell for Dan Rather's false *memo* are still at
it.


TR> You might not realize what Bush actually did `for' Libby.


TR> If Bush issues him a presidential pardon....and Libby takes it....that
TR> is almost the same as an admission of guilt. A *pardon* is not
TR> `exoneration', or the same as an acquital, or a case being dismissed
TR> due to lack of evidence or other reasons.


RS>So why did Cheney beg, plead, almost threaten Bush to pardon Libby?


You were in the room when that happened? You have a recorded transcript of
such a conversation?





---
*Durango b301 #PE*