"TIM RICHARDSON -> ROSS SAUER"  wrote in
news:18011$MATZDOBRE{at}JamNNTPd:

 RS>> You see, in conservafairyland, being a liar under oath is *NOBLE*
 TR> at least RS>according to Dick Cheney.


 TR> Clinton lied under oath and you never said a word of protest!

We're not talking about Bill Clinton. That was 10 years ago and has been
settled and done with. Only the frothing nutcases like the "Clinton Body
Count" FTB's are still at it.

 TR> You might not realize what Bush actually did `for' Libby.


 TR> If Bush issues him a presidential pardon....and Libby takes it....that
 TR> is almost the same as an admission of guilt. A *pardon* is not
 TR> `exoneration', or the same as an acquital, or a case being dismissed
 TR> due to lack of evidence or other reasons.

So why did Cheney beg, plead, almost threaten Bush to pardon Libby?

--- Xnews/5.04.25