On Feb 21, 9:42 am, Jan  wrote:
> In article
, Amy
> Guskin says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>> On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 06:49:32 -0500, Jan wrote
> >(in article ):
>
> >> In article
> >,
> >> StarFuryG7 says...
>
> >>> On Jan 21, 10:16=A0pm, Amy Guskin
 wrote:
> >>>>> Could someone please explain what this Pioneers
of Television - Science
> >>>>> Fiction *is*? =A0Is it a tv show? =A0What
channel? =A0I'm amazed that no=
> >>> ne of the
> >>>>> messages in the thread thus far have revealed
this information.
>
> >>>>> Amy
>
> >>> On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:28:56 -0500, StarFuryG7 wrote
> >>>>> LMAO
>
> >>>>> How pathetic. <<
>
> >>> On Feb 20, 9:08 pm, Amy Guskin
 wrote:
> >>>> Uh, what? =A0What, specifically, was pathetic about this?
>
> >>>> Amy
>
> >>> Your inability and apparent lack of interest in doing a
little basic
> >>> research on your own to find out. Just using the title of
the show to
> >>> run a basic Google Search would have worked wonders for you had you
> >>> bothered, believe it or not.
>
> >> And a bit of civility would work wonders for you.  Here's a
hint:  Amy's been
> >> around for a long time, she's *very* well liked here.  The
last (and only)
> >> time
> >> we saw you was last year when you popped in to make an
unexplained snarky
> >> comment aimed at JMS. Folks here don't generally appreciate
that sort of
> >> behavior. <<
>
> >He's posted here before this current deluge?  Shows you how much of an
> >impression he made on me (and on my newsreader; when I sorted by author, I
> >didn't find any previous messages from him).
>
> >Amy
>
> Once.  Back in March last year in a thread about downloading where he snarked to
> JMS that he'd never spend another nickle on JMS' stuff after Crusade.  No
> explanation or embellishment.  S/He appears to be what I generally term
> manners-challenged.
>
> Jan
LMAO --But apparently that doesn't apply to you too.
As for the message about "Crusade" --Gee, I must have forgotten to
come back.
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32