-=> Quoting Paul Nixon to Steve Gunhouse on 30 Jul 96  19:52 <=-
 Re: Terror 
 PN> Heard on talk radio, Monday during the 1500 hour of the Bob Mohan
 PN> show, Phoenix KFYI:

 PN> Now, here's the speculation on the part of Mohan: if this airliner
 PN> was within a mile of some coastal defense zone (I don't have the
 PN> appropriate sectional, but understand it to contain information that
 PN> flight within the MOA is "hazardous") it would have been within range
 PN> of medium- or perhaps long-range missiles.  Under control by our own
 PN> military.
 PN> What if something or somebody screwed up?  Is this possible?
 PN> Conceivable?  And if it happened would we ever know?
No, I can't conceive of that. Why would they have "defensive" missiles 
pointed towards the mainland USA. If the airline strayed off its flight 
path, I think they would have said something. And so forth.
No, I can't see any way that it would be accidental involving a missile 
and they wouldn't tell us. I can see that some terrorists might have used 
a missile (not a Stinger, but some other kind), and they're still looking 
into that possibility.
 PN> And isn't it convenient for the administration that these incidents
 PN> have happened just after Clinton was partly defeated on his "terror
 PN> bill," and he's now back wanting the same elements that were tossed
 PN> out of the bill the last time around.
 PN> OKC, TWA800, Atlanta...man, I dunno.
Yes, I said how convenient this all was. Don't leave out the two bombings 
in Saudi Arabia, the Vipers, Bob Starr and company, and now these arrests 
in Washington state. Among others.
Personally, I think there will always be something they can capitalize 
on. They don't need to create situations, just bring out the ones that 
fit their agenda. Just like the black church hoax earlier this year.
Steve
... An army cannot be administered. It must be led. - Strauss
--- GEcho 1.00
---------------