Jeff Binkley -> Ed Hulett wrote:



 RS>>>>> Where has Marxism, even in it's "purest"
form, ever succeeded?
 RS>>>>> I don't know how Marxism operates, and quite
honestly, I don't
 RS>>>>> give a shit.

 JB>>>> You make comments like this and yet you support a party that
 RS>>> continually
 JB>>>> tries to move us closer and closer to this failed theory.

 RS>>> Only in fairyland.

 EH>> Again, you make foolish, juvenile comments and think you are actually
 EH>> contributing to the discussion.

 RS>>>>> Fascism doesn't work, neither does theocracy.

 JB>>>> Success and failure are defined by the end objectives.  Both
 JB>>>> can and have "worked" depending upon your
definition of success
 JB>>>> the period of time you are willing to look at.

 RS>>> If a government needs to use repressive methods, it's a failure.
 RS>>> If it needs to dictate "patriotism" or
"being devout" it's a
 RS>>> If failure.

 EH>> You admit that you have no clue and then you offer this.

 JB> This all translates to the 60's juvenile mentality of "You can't tell me
 JB> what to do."  Nothing more.

RK is definitely juvenile.

Ed

-- 
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is
to fill the world with fools." --Herbert Spencer

Blogs: http://edsramblings.wordpress.com  | Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/ed.hulett
http://woodcarvingnsuch.wordpress.com     | Twitter: yaesu
http://edsscrollsawbits.blogspot.com

Linux User# 416016
Linux Machine# 379711

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)