"Jeff Binkley -> Ross Sauer"  wrote in news:18516
$MATZDOBRE{at}JamNNTPd:

 RS>>>> Where has Marxism, even in it's "purest" form, ever
succeeded?
 RS>>>> I don't know how Marxism operates, and quite honestly, I
don't
 RS>>>> give a shit.

 JB>>> You make comments like this and yet you support a party that
 JB>>> continually tries to move us closer and closer to this failed
 JB>>> theory.

 RS>> Only in fairyland.

 JB> EVerything the Dems push is based upon Socialism or Marxism doctrine.

Sure thing, Binky. If that's true, everything the republicans push is
based on fascism.
See how this works? You make up a total bullshit smear, so I respond in
kind, so you'll understand.

 RS>> If a government needs to use repressive methods, it's a failure.
 RS>> If it needs to dictate "patriotism" or "being
devout" it's a
failure.

 JB> I see.  Yet systems of government which span many hundreds of years
are
 JB> of no consequence, regardless of the methods they employ ?  By your
 JB> definition there have been very few successful governments throughout
 JB> the history of mankind.  We might as well have anarchy.  It doesn't
 JB> break either of your rules.

All or nothing. Black and white. Waiut a minute, in your view, all is
nothing, and black is white.

 RS>> That's why the US has been a Constitutional republic, as opposed to
a
 RS>> pure democracy, for 200+ years.
 RS>> A pure democracy results in a "tyranny of the majority."

 JB> I might as well be talking to a tree stump.

Then do so.
If the US is going so "socialist" or "Marxist" as you
fatasize, leave.
Find a country that fits your worldview better, like this place:

http://www.rickross.com/reference/schafer/schafer27.html

"Gott mit uns."

--- Xnews/5.04.25