Jan wrote:
> On Mar 31, 9:52 am, Dan Dassow  wrote:
> 
>>On Mar 31, 7:31 am, Jan  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>Methinks, since you made a major contribution to volumn 15, CafePress
>>needs to lock you in the same bunker as the other JMS so that you can
>>sign "Jan M Schroeder" more time than you ever imaged you ever
>>would. :-)
> 
> 
> LOL, yeah, like anybody'd be interested in *my* autograph.  Anyway,
> we're on opposite coasts so it'd be hard to share a bunker
> 
> 
>>It also occured to me that CafePress did not directly state that J.
>>Michael Straczynski will sign his full name. Maybe we will just sign
>>"JMS" or "Joe". In which case, Jan could simply
sign "Jan".
>>
> 
> 
> Psst...that's the Scripts Team, not CafePress.  I've always kind of
> wondered why he doesn't just sign JMS.  Maybe the forgery factor?  As
> he said, it's sometimes good to have a signature that looks like an
> elven rune.
> 
> Jan
> 
Actually, I had read somewhere that a legible signature (you know, one 
where someone had actually paid attention in penmanship class!) was much 
harder to forge than what passes for signatures nowadays. Most of what I 
see might as well be an "X" marking the spot.

This coming from someone who once told someone at a title company who 
complained about my signature, "if you could read it, it wouldn't be my 
signature!"

Blair
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32