Hello Alexander,

 AK>>>>> In other words SAR2 is a scaled replica of SAR. It will die
 AK>>>>> after people in the area (Earth in the SAR2 case) become exposed
 AK>>>>> to the virus for necessary time. After that the epidemic ends.
 DS>>>> And by then, millions of people will have died from it. Many more
 DS>>>> will have lasting effects from the infection.

 ak>>> It depends on the methods they count covid deaths. I had already
 ak>>> told you here that if, in the last year, the current covid death
 ak>>> counting method would have been applied to the people who died
 ak>>> just _WITH_ flu virus we will see flu as the most awful epidemic.
 ak>>> In other words, the high numbers of covid deaths are artificial.
 ak>>> WHO demands that every dead person should be considered killed by
 ak>>> covid if the virus found in the body. It is utterly wrong and
 ak>>> misleading and makes unnecessary panic.

 LL>> Laurie Garrett, a specialist on the coronavirus, explained it in
 LL>> ways better understood. The problem is cardiovascular. People with
 LL>> diabetes, heart problems, and hypertension (high blood pressure)
 LL>> are most at risk of dying. Of those who have died, 100 percent had
 LL>> hypertension. Someone who does not have any of those conditions
 LL>> could contract the virus, but would most likely only suffer mild
 LL>> symptoms, and maybe none at all.

 ak> I say once again -- any illnesses like flue, pneumonia cause heavy
 ak> complications on the people with chronic diseases. If you have flu and
 ak> temperature 103F, it can end lamentably if you have cardiovascular and
 ak> other problems. I repeat that the matter is to which illness you
 ak> attribute death if it happened.

Here's the problem -
The CDC counts those who have died *with* COVID-19.
But people of the country want to know how many people
have died *of* COVID-19.

One can argue there are few cases with COVID-19
as the cause of death, but rather lots of cases with
COVID-19 as an underlying cause of death.

It gets even worse, as the CDC uses two different sets
of criteria to determine who has died as a result of COVID-19.
And both of those sets are subjective (one set being each state
with its own criteria, the other set each individual physcician
with his/her own criteria).

"You have situations where a person dies from multiple causes.
You could put down COVID, you could put down cancer, you could
put down heart disease. So, at one point, it becomes fairly
random, and we're basically at that point."
~ Andrew Cuomo, Governor of New York

 ak> As you know a patient with AIDS dies not of AIDS, but of flu or
 ak> pneumonia, but only crazy people say that he dies of flu or pneumonia.
 ak> In other words, medics should count deaths of all diseases in equal way.
 ak> And in this way the death numbers will not concentrate on the account of
 ak> one disease, as is now in case of covid epidemic.

If an individual who has died is found to be, or have been,
COVID-19 positive, then he/she is often counted as having died
of COVID-19. Even if other underlying causes were what killed
him/her. The distinction is left to the physician to decide.

More accurate would be to say the person died of complications
due to COVID-19, rather than of COVID-19 itself.

Kind of like AIDS. Nobody dies of AIDS. Just look at Magic Johnson.

--Lee

-- 
In solidarity - RIP George Floyd - Black Lives Matter

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb