Mulling over George Pope to Steve Asher 08 Aug 2006

SA> Mulling over George Pope to Steve Asher 20 Jul 2006
SA> 
SA>  GP> On (19 Jul 06) Steve Asher wrote to George Pope...
SA>  SA> Mulling over George Pope to Steve Asher 18 Jul 2006
SA>  SA>
SA>  SA>  GP> Posting this in this echo implies you don't believe
SA>  SA> there can be
SA>  SA>  GP> ANY benign or positive application of this technology. . .
SA>  SA>
SA>  SA>  GP> Is that so?
SA>  SA>
SA>  SA> You are free to infer whatever you wish from any post in this
SA>  SA> echo (or
SA>  SA> any other echo, or source).
SA> 
SA>  GP> I prefer to hear the actual facts from the person himself, not
SA>  GP> infer anything that would have too muh chance of being in error (as
SA>  GP> I don't have the benefit of hearing YOUR view on it!)
SA> 
SA> Read your opening sentence ... you have inferred that I don't believe
SA> there can be ANY benign or positive application (etc). I have no idea
SA> why you would infer that (or why "this" [my post] implies that which
SA> you have inferred), but you are free to do so.

 GP> Read what I had said -- by posting in this echo such material,
 GP> you're implying that you deem it to be on the topic of
 GP> "conspiracy". . .

I deem it to be on the topic of "conspiracy", which is why I posted it.

 GP>  this concept(conspiracy) is not one that lends
 GP> itself to positive inferences. 

You inferred that I don't believe that there can be ANY benign or
positive application of this technology. You are free to infer that,
or anything else you wish. Perhaps you could try to be a little less
rigid in which you infer from various posts. Just a thought.

Cheers, Steve..

---