31 May 08 06:55, TOM WALKER wrote to ROY WITT:


 RW>> They weren't gripping about the profits, but the 'bonus' money paid
 RW>> to somebody who doesn't do anything to produce the profits. i.e. a
 RW>> CEO is overhead, propped up by real labor and production.

 TW> Wel obviously you are either5 total;y unaware fo the runijng of
 TW> corprate structure

I've ran one a while ago. I'm running one now.

 TW>  or a tunnel Visioned UNION Man.

I'd pay top dollar for the head of one of those.

 TW> The Corporate Head Shed IS the Guiding force behind the Labor and
 TW> Production part of a company.

Yeah, but can he manage it? No. He hires someone to do that.

 TW> And the CEO is paid in accordance to his Worth Overall to the
 TW> Coporation.

In that case, this CEO is waaaaaaaayyyyyyyyy overpaid.

 TW> And let me Assure you that IF the Exxon head was NOT worth 12.5 Mil
 TW> he would be out of there in a blink of an eye.

Only if the share-holders get less income in their monthly checks. Their
scrupples are as bad as the CEOs.

                R\%/itt



--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000