Ross Sauer -> Ross Cassell wrote:

 RC>> Are people allowed to possess religious beliefs?

 RS> No reason why not, within limits.

Within limits???

Should limits be placed onto your beliefs?

 RS> If a person has a religious belief that flagrantly breaks the law, this is
 RS> not allowed.

So you advocate the thought police?

 RS> There is a case going through the courts right now, that deals with this.
 RS> A religious sect uses a type of tea they make from tree bark that is
 RS> hallucenigenic, and possibly addictive.

and where do the native American Indians fall into this schema, those whom
still practice the ancient rituals?

 > There has been a number of cases including right here in WI of parents
 RS> resorting to prayer, after their children get sick or hurt, instead of
 RS> proper medical care.

That is still a hairy line...

If people can legally shun meat among other things, why cant they shun the
medical community?

As it is, liberal whackos are pursuing the legalization of physician
assisted suicide, why cant people pursue the non-assistance from a
physician, even if to their detriment?

-- 
Ross
Fidonet Feeds Or Fidonet In Your Newsreader: http://www.easternstar.info
E-mail: ross(at)cassell(dot)us | Other Places: http://links.cassell.us
Fidonet Netmail Routing Chart Z1 Only: http://netmail.fidonet4u.info

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209