RC> RC>> Are people allowed to possess religious beliefs?

RC> RS> No reason why not, within limits.

RC>Within limits???

RC>Should limits be placed onto your beliefs?

And who decides what those limits are.


RC> RS> If a person has a religious belief that flagrantly breaks the
RC> RS> law, this is not allowed.

RC>So you advocate the thought police?

Liberals have been all over this with hate crimes and more.


RC> RS> There is a case going through the courts right now, that deals
RC> RS> with this. A religious sect uses a type of tea they make from
RC> RS> tree bark that is hallucenigenic, and possibly addictive.

RC>and where do the native American Indians fall into this schema, those
RC>whom still practice the ancient rituals?

Queue the crickets.

RC> > There has been a number of cases including right here in WI of
RC>parents  RS> resorting to prayer, after their children get sick or
RC> RS> hurt, instead of proper medical care.

RC>That is still a hairy line...

RC>If people can legally shun meat among other things, why cant they
RC>shun the medical community?

The medical community never makes mistakes. 


RC>As it is, liberal whackos are pursuing the legalization of physician
RC>assisted suicide, why cant people pursue the non-assistance from a
RC>physician, even if to their detriment?

Statistics show that more people die in hospitals than outside of them.  
Sure most are sick when they go in but many get worse instead of better.  


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Stop the Democrat party oil embargo ....



--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10