From: "Gregg N" 

Mike '/m' wrote:
>> If there are no lexical conflicts (the changes do not
>> affect the same lines) there is no need for manual intervention.
>
> That is a highly optimistic viewpoint.  Too optimistic, IMO.
>
> /m

No optimism is involved here. I only meant that the tool's merge process
does not require manual intervention as long as there are no lexical
conflicts. I then went on to say:

"The only caveat is that lack of lexical conflict does not guarantee
lack of semantic conflict."

In other words there is no guarantee that the end result is correct, but
the automated approach is usually the fastest way to the correct result.

Gregg

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5