HI cIndy,

Cindy Haglund wrote in a message to Richard Webb:

 RW> POssibly, tried to break it up into chunks.  Came from usenet where
 RW> they don't have the message length requirements. THought folks might
 RW> find it fun though .

CH>   It is... :) Reminds me of a lot of bloopers I've read of. Someone
CH> told me of a scene where the actor is entering a room. The subsquent
CH> scene was shot months later where in you see him coming through the
CH> door  and he's evidenlty put on a bit of weight.

HEard of a lot of those.  I don't notice them as much being a blind man,
but I sure do notice the audio flubs. I"m an audio professional too,
though, and that makes them even more noticeable. wITh all these different
system, 5.1 surround sound, etc. it seems the audio has gotten worse, not
better.

A friend told me of a scene in GOne with the wINd iirc where you could see
truck tire tracks on the ground, and in another film that was supposed to
be a period piece where you could see a construction crane in the
background.

I recall a few years ago a friend of mine from the film sound world
complained about a western he was working on. THey set this one scene in a
nice old country barn that just fit the period nicely, without thinking
that they'd have to dub all the dialogue in in post production because the
noise of the airport kinda ruined the period feel .

CH> Or a character goes into an elevator wearing a certain shirt, coems
CH> out with a differnt one on....
YEp, I can believe that.  sHot two different days .

Regards,
           Richard
--- timEd 1.10.y2k+